
Car accidents are a common personal injury case and as such, serve as a useful hypothetical to clarify the type of situation we are discussing. Imagine you are driving and you end up at a four-way stop. Another driver is opposite you and arrives a few moments after. You go to turn left but you forgot to put your blinker on and the other driver speeds forward and hits you as you are turning. Now, let us imagine that the other driver was texting and driving as they approached, stopped, and proceeded to collide with your car. This is the type of situation comparative fault is supposed to handle. Both drivers in this hypothetical are at-fault for the accident; however, the driver who was texting throughout the entire incident would appear to be more at fault as they were disregarding their responsibilities of operating a vehicle.
Arkansas law is interesting in how it deals with these types of situations. We have what is known as “modified comparative fault”. For those interested in the text of the law, it can be found at 2010 Arkansas Code, Comparative Fault. Arkansas uses what has become known as the 50% rule. That is to say, that a judge or jury will prescribe fault to the parties involved and so long as the plaintiff is less at fault than the defendant, the plaintiff is allowed to recover. So, in our example if a
As you probably imagine, cases with comparative fault can become complicated quickly. If you have a case that sounds similar to this kind of situation, or you are simply seeking legal advice feel free to contact the law office of Oliver Law Firm.
We serve Rogers, Bentonville, Springdale, Lowell, Bella Vista, Centerton, Decatur, Highfill, Cave Springs, Gravette, Pea Ridge, Fayetteville, Huntsville, Berryville, Eureka Springs and all of Arkansas.
a Free Consultation